Advertising on LinkedIn
At a high level, advertising on LinkedIn has it’s pros and cons. We’ve seen a ton of upside when tracking down to revenue. The up front costs will be higher than other channels, but the lead quality that can be generated through the targeting capabilities is high. Targeting your audience through either their career qualifications or your ABM list offers a very focused look at who you can reach. For reference, we are referring to Sponsored Content ad type**
LinkedIn Video Ads
The video set up for paid LinkedIn campaigns will be similar to what you’re used to. Unlike Facebook, LinkedIn doesn’t keep playing the video if the user scrolls past. Best practice (if you’re driving action/leads/or traffic) is to have 10 seconds or less, setting up your content or company. The videos will auto play as the user scrolls past in the news feed.
- Minimum video length: 3 seconds
- Maximum video length: 30 minutes
- Minimum file size: 75KB
- Maximum file size: 200MB
- Orientation: Only horizontal. Vertical videos are not supported by LinkedIn video ads.
- Pixel and aspect ratio:
- 360p (480 x 360; wide 640 x 360)
- 480p (640 x 480)
- 720p (960 x 720; wide 1280 x 720)
- 1080p (1440 x 1080; wide 1920 x 1080)
- File format: MP4
- Frame rate: Maximum of 30 frames per second.
- Audio format: AAC or MPEG4
- Audio size: Less than 64KHz
LinkedIn Static Image Ad
For the static ads, there are some advantages. Don’t get me wrong we still run a high amount of static ad campaigns. It makes it much easier to test imagery, it’s not an easy lift to iterate video files against one another. So you could be stuck testing only description, headline and CTA.
- The supplied URL will automatically scrape in title and image, but you can also upload images manually
- Recommended 1.91:1 ratio (1200 pixels by 627 pixels)
- Image upload maximum weight: 5MB
- Image upload supported types: JPEG, GIF, PNG
- Image must be more than 200 pixels in width
- If your image width is below 200 pixels it will appear as a thumbnail on the left side of the post
Text Requirements for Both Video and Static:
The following applies to both Video and Static breakout:
- 150 characters before truncation (truncation is based on padding, not character limitation, so results may vary depending on screen size)
- On desktop, intro text goes up to about 600 characters, but text is truncated around 150 characters and displays “…read more” to expand text
Post-click landing page URL
- Characters count toward introductory text limits, so it’s suggested to use 150 characters or less, including the URL, in your introductory text
- All URLs must include the “http://” “or https://” prefix
- URLs longer than 23 characters are shortened by the LinkedIn shortener
- Max of 70 characters to avoid truncation
Real World Example: The Test Setup
When users are on the platform they are usually in a professional mindset looking for engaging content to further their careers. LinkedIn excels in offering targeted advertising by job function, titles, seniority, industry, etc. To increase their ad type offering, (a battle which they are currently losing with Facebook) they recently launched sponsored video ads. We’ve got information and resources on different ad type comparisons related to advertising on LinkedIn.
The sponsored video ads feature on the LI feed that we all scroll through. When a user sees a video, it will automatically start playing. In a recent survey of professionals, 62% of users agreed that video is the most important way to reach and engage professionals.
After running several successful video campaigns on Facebook, we had an idea that LinkedIn would optimize and serve interactive media over static images. Of course, we set up a test.
The caveat here is that there hasn’t been a full month of data, but we have had a lot of clients and coworkers take interest in how video was performing on LinkedIn so we thought we’d share our initial thoughts.
Video Ads Testing
We set up campaigns to custom matched audience lists that put image ads side by side video ads. For both ad formats, we integrated with lead generation forms, offering LinkedIn members a seamless user experience. We launched all campaigns to identical audiences, targeting, and budgets to let the platform optimize itself. After a week being live it was clear to see that the platform was showing the video ads more frequently so impression, click, and spend figures were drastically different.
To even the playing field, we looked at the efficiency and engagement metrics. For lead generation campaigns, video ads are effective in driving form completions and users have a higher propensity to submit a form from a video rather than a static ad.
Initial Results: Video vs Static
After just two weeks, the only thing that static ads had over video was a 20% lower CPC. Looking further down the funnel video ads performed at a 254% higher form completion rate, 276% higher conversion rate, and a 68% lower cost per lead. We went into the test imagining video would perform better, but we had no idea HOW much better. And to all the naysayers that are thinking, “probably from 1,000 impressions and low spend”, this was from almost 75k impressions and over $7k spend.
There are theories that as a new initiative, LinkedIn is going to optimize video, but why not take advantage of it?! We ran the identical test on the Facebook platform and saw the volume of video conversions was less than the static image, but the cost per lead and conversion rates were more efficient.
Video seems to be where engagement ads are heading. We recommend running your own test for your short, engaging video content, but as far as we’re concerned, video will feature in all our LinkedIn campaigns moving forward!